Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda (Talk | contribs)
(New page: {{Lexico-Syntactic_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} {{Lexico-Syntactic ODP Template |Name=Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP |Language=English |AlsoKnownAs...)
Next diff →

Revision as of 12:27, 23 February 2010

Warning!

This is an old revision. Go to current revision

This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 7301

Description

Name Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP
Language English
Also known as LSP-EQ-EN
Intent Recursive expressions in English that state that two classes are equivalent
Solution description The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Logical ODP for the Equivalence relation between Classes Logical ODP
Description of the correspondence relation between the LSPs and the ODPs one LSP to one ODP
Related ODP(s)
Web reference http://www.neon-project.org/nw/Deliverables (D5.1.1)
Author(s) Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez
Submitted by ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda


Cases

The Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP Lexico-Syntactic ODP includes the following cases (see also abbreviations and symbols used in LSP Formalization):


Reviews

Reviews about Lexico Syntactic ODP corresponding to Equivalence relation between Classes ODP

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 7301) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers