Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation ODP
From Odp
(New page: {{Lexico-Syntactic_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} {{Lexico-Syntactic ODP Template |Name=Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation ODP |Language=Spanish |AlsoKnownAs=LSP-SC-ES |Inte...) |
m (Text replace - '{{Reviews about me}}' to '{{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}}') |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{Case list header}} | {{Case list header}} | ||
- | {{Reviews about me}} | + | {{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}} |
Revision as of 13:23, 1 March 2010
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) add a new scenario for Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation ODP In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 8239 |
Description
Name | Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation ODP |
---|---|
Language | Spanish |
Also known as | LSP-SC-ES |
Intent | Recursive expressions in Spanish that state the relation holding between a class and its sublclasses |
Solution description | The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Logical ODP for modelling "SubclassOf relation", described in the Technical report D5.1.1, NeOn project Deliverable (see Web Reference below). |
Description of the correspondence relation between the LSPs and the ODPs | one LSP to one ODP |
Related ODP(s) | |
Web reference | http://www.neon-project.org/nw/Deliverables |
Author(s) | Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez |
Submitted by | ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda |
Cases
The Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to SubclassOf relation ODP Lexico-Syntactic ODP includes the following cases (see also abbreviations and symbols used in LSP Formalization):
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 8239) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.