Submissions:Xsd:sequence embedding

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (08:31, 31 May 2010) (view source)
m (Text replace - 'WOP2009:Main' to 'WOP:2009')
 
(29 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Reengineering_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Reengineering_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal General Information Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal General Information Template
-
|Name=xsd:sequence embedding
+
|Name=Structural XML/DTD embedding to ontological meronymy
-
|Problem=This pattern addresses the re-engineering of an of xsd:element embedded into an xsd:sequence, which is in its turn embedded by an xsd:element.
+
|Problem=This pattern addresses the re-engineering of certain embedded structures within XSD and DTD representations into a meronymic pattern.
-
The ontological result is a meronymic structure.
+
}}
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal NOR Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal NOR Template
-
|Description=xx
+
|Description=*For a description of XSD see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Schema_(W3C)
-
|Graphical Representation=1.jpg
+
The pattern covers the cases where an xsd:element is embedded into an xsd:sequence, which is in its turn embedded by an xsd:element.
 +
*The graphical representation only illustrates the XSD case.
 +
*The DTD case is described in the example section.
 +
|Graphical Representation=1.JPG
}}
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Ontology Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Ontology Template
-
|Description=xx
+
|Description=The ontology comprising the pattern representing the relevant XSD or DTD fragment.
-
|Graphical Representation=Xsd-embedding2.jpg
+
|Graphical Representation=Xsd-embedding2.JPG
}}
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Process Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Process Template
-
|Description=xx
+
|Description=The re-engineering process involves a number of steps:
-
|Graphical Representation=Xsd-step3.jpg
+
*The creation of embedding class and embedded class(es)
 +
*The creation of an instance of the hasPart object property from the DOLCE Ultra Light ontology (http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl) with embedding class as domain and embedded class(es) as range.
 +
|Graphical Representation=Xsd-step3.png
}}
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Scenario Example Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Scenario Example Template
-
|Description=The application scenarion is in the area of the modelling of lexical translational equivalence according to the format of the XLIFF standard.
+
|Description=The application scenario is in the area of the modelling of lexical translational equivalence according to the format of the XLIFF and TMX standards for translation memory.
}}
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal NOR Example Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal NOR Example Template
-
|Description=The purpose of the OASIS XLIFF standard (http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/v1.2/os/xliff-core.html) is to define and promote, through extensible XML vocabularies, the adoption of a specification for the interchange of localizable software and document based objects and related metadata.
+
|Description=XLIFF
 +
The purpose of the OASIS XLIFF standard (http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/v1.2/os/xliff-core.html) is to define and promote, through extensible XML vocabularies, the adoption of a specification for the interchange of localizable software and document based objects and related metadata.
XLIFF should be able to mark-up and capture localization information and interoperate with different processes and phases without loss of information. It should fulfill specific requirements of being tool-neutral. It should support the localization related aspects of internationalization and entire localization process. It also needs to support common software and content data formats. This should also provide an extensibility mechanism to allow the development of tools compatible with an implementer’s proprietary data formats and workflow requirements.
XLIFF should be able to mark-up and capture localization information and interoperate with different processes and phases without loss of information. It should fulfill specific requirements of being tool-neutral. It should support the localization related aspects of internationalization and entire localization process. It also needs to support common software and content data formats. This should also provide an extensibility mechanism to allow the development of tools compatible with an implementer’s proprietary data formats and workflow requirements.
-
1. TransUnit: contains (a set of) translational equivalences
+
*1. TransUnit: contains (a set of) translational equivalences
-
2. Source: the source of the translation pair
+
*2. Source: the source of the translation pair
-
3. SegSource: the translatable text, divided into segments
+
*3. SegSource: the translatable text, divided into segments
-
4. Mrk: Each segment is marked by means of the <Mrk> element with attribute  
+
*4. Mrk: Each segment is marked by means of the <Mrk> element with attribute “mType” set to the value "seg".
-
i. “mType” set to the value "seg".
+
*5. Target: the target of the translation pair
-
5. Target: the target of the translation pair
+
*6. Alt-Trans: possible translations as Target instances
-
6. Alt-Trans: possible translations as Target instances
+
*7. Equiv-trans: Indicates if the target language translation is a direct equivalent of the source text.
-
7. Equiv-trans: Indicates if the target language translation is a direct equivalent of the source text.
+
 
-
|Graphical Representation=xsd-step4.jpg
+
DTD embedding is exemplified (but not illustrated on this page) by Translation Memory eXchange standard (TMX) (http://www.lisa.org/Translation-Memory-e.34.0.html). TMX is the vendor-neutral open XML standard for the exchange of Translation Memory data created by Computer Aided Translation and localization tools. The purpose of TMX is to allow easier exchange of translation memory data between tools and/or translation vendors with little or no loss of critical data during the process. In existence since 1998, TMX is a certifiable standard format. TMX is developed and maintained by OSCAR (Open Standards for Container/Content Allowing Re-use), a LISA  (Localization Industry Standards Association) Special Interest Group.
 +
The following structure from TMX illustrates the same pattern conversion
 +
 
 +
  <!ELEMENT tu    (tuv+) >
 +
This describes that a translation unit (tu) consists of one or more translation unit variants (tuv).
 +
A translationUnit contains the data for a given translation unit.
 +
A TranslationUnitVariant specifies text in a given language.
 +
A more detailed description of TMX can be found in NeOn deliverable D2.4.3: Multilingual and Localization Support for Ontologies (www.neon-project.org).
 +
|Graphical Representation=xsd-step4.png
|Web Reference=http://schemas.liquid-technologies.com/Oasis/XLIFF/1.2/default.html?url=http://schemas.liquid-technologies.com/Oasis/XLIFF/1.2/xliff-core-1_2-strict_xsd.html
|Web Reference=http://schemas.liquid-technologies.com/Oasis/XLIFF/1.2/default.html?url=http://schemas.liquid-technologies.com/Oasis/XLIFF/1.2/xliff-core-1_2-strict_xsd.html
}}
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Ontology Example Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Ontology Example Template
-
|Description=The xsd:sequence embedding pattern as ontology.
+
|Description=The xsd:sequence embedding pattern as the resulting ontology pattern.
-
|Graphical Representation=xsd-step5.jpg
+
|Graphical Representation=xsd-step5.JPG
-
|Web Reference=http://gate.ac.uk/gate-extras/neon/ontologies/xsd-embedding.owl.owl
+
|Web Reference=http://gate.ac.uk/gate-extras/neon/ontologies/xsd-embedding.owl
}}
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Process Example Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Process Example Template
-
|Description=The pattern tailored to the XLIFF fragment.
+
|Description=The ontological pattern re-engineered from the XLIFF fragment.
-
|Graphical Representation=xsd-embedding-step6.jpg
+
|Graphical Representation=Xsd-embedding-6.png
}}
}}
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Additional Information Template
{{Reengineering OP Proposal Additional Information Template
 +
|SubmittedBy=Wim Peters
|Author=Wim Peters
|Author=Wim Peters
}}
}}
{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Scenarios about me}}
-
{{Reviews about me}}
+
{{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}}
 +
{{Submission to event
 +
|Event=WOP:2009
 +
}}

Current revision


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have informations about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 9710

General information

Name Structural XML/DTD embedding to ontological meronymy
Problem This pattern addresses the re-engineering of certain embedded structures within XSD and DTD representations into a meronymic pattern.


Non-Ontological Resource

Description *For a description of XSD see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML_Schema_(W3C)

The pattern covers the cases where an xsd:element is embedded into an xsd:sequence, which is in its turn embedded by an xsd:element.

  • The graphical representation only illustrates the XSD case.
  • The DTD case is described in the example section.
Graphical Representation

Diagram

Image:1.JPG


Ontology

Description The ontology comprising the pattern representing the relevant XSD or DTD fragment.
Graphical Representation

Diagram

Image:Xsd-embedding2.JPG


Process

Description The re-engineering process involves a number of steps:
  • The creation of embedding class and embedded class(es)
  • The creation of an instance of the hasPart object property from the DOLCE Ultra Light ontology (http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl) with embedding class as domain and embedded class(es) as range.
Graphical Representation

Diagram

Image:Xsd-step3.png


Scenario example

Description The application scenario is in the area of the modelling of lexical translational equivalence according to the format of the XLIFF and TMX standards for translation memory.


Example of a Non-Ontological Resource

Description XLIFF

The purpose of the OASIS XLIFF standard (http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/v1.2/os/xliff-core.html) is to define and promote, through extensible XML vocabularies, the adoption of a specification for the interchange of localizable software and document based objects and related metadata. XLIFF should be able to mark-up and capture localization information and interoperate with different processes and phases without loss of information. It should fulfill specific requirements of being tool-neutral. It should support the localization related aspects of internationalization and entire localization process. It also needs to support common software and content data formats. This should also provide an extensibility mechanism to allow the development of tools compatible with an implementer’s proprietary data formats and workflow requirements.

  • 1. TransUnit: contains (a set of) translational equivalences
  • 2. Source: the source of the translation pair
  • 3. SegSource: the translatable text, divided into segments
  • 4. Mrk: Each segment is marked by means of the <Mrk> element with attribute “mType” set to the value "seg".
  • 5. Target: the target of the translation pair
  • 6. Alt-Trans: possible translations as Target instances
  • 7. Equiv-trans: Indicates if the target language translation is a direct equivalent of the source text.

DTD embedding is exemplified (but not illustrated on this page) by Translation Memory eXchange standard (TMX) (http://www.lisa.org/Translation-Memory-e.34.0.html). TMX is the vendor-neutral open XML standard for the exchange of Translation Memory data created by Computer Aided Translation and localization tools. The purpose of TMX is to allow easier exchange of translation memory data between tools and/or translation vendors with little or no loss of critical data during the process. In existence since 1998, TMX is a certifiable standard format. TMX is developed and maintained by OSCAR (Open Standards for Container/Content Allowing Re-use), a LISA (Localization Industry Standards Association) Special Interest Group. The following structure from TMX illustrates the same pattern conversion

  <!ELEMENT tu     (tuv+) >

This describes that a translation unit (tu) consists of one or more translation unit variants (tuv). A translationUnit contains the data for a given translation unit. A TranslationUnitVariant specifies text in a given language. A more detailed description of TMX can be found in NeOn deliverable D2.4.3: Multilingual and Localization Support for Ontologies (www.neon-project.org).

Graphical Representation

Diagram

Image:xsd-step4.png

Web Reference http://schemas.liquid-technologies.com/Oasis/XLIFF/1.2/default.html?url=http://schemas.liquid-technologies.com/Oasis/XLIFF/1.2/xliff-core-1_2-strict_xsd.html


Ontology example

Description The xsd:sequence embedding pattern as the resulting ontology pattern.
Graphical Representation

Diagram

Image:xsd-step5.JPG

Web Reference http://gate.ac.uk/gate-extras/neon/ontologies/xsd-embedding.owl


Process example

Description The ontological pattern re-engineered from the XLIFF fragment.
Graphical Representation

Diagram

Image:Xsd-embedding-6.png


About

SubmittedBy Wim Peters
Author Wim Peters
Also known as
Known uses
Related to
Other References


Scenarios

Scenarios about Xsd:sequence embedding

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about Xsd:sequence embedding
Review article Posted on About revision (current is 9710)
MathieuDAquin about Xsd:sequence embedding 24550838 September 2009 56285,628
EnricoDaga about Xsd:sequence embedding 24550838 September 2009 57235,723
BorisVillazón-Terrazas about Xsd:sequence embedding 24550838 September 2009 57235,723

This revision (revision ID 9710) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Modeling issues

Modeling issues about Xsd:sequence embedding

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


Submission to event

WOP:2009

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers