Community:Sex (of those who are not angels)
From Odp
Current revision (13:36, 23 January 2012) (view source) (how this issue is managed in DOLCE) |
|||
(One intermediate revision not shown.) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TitleDescription Template | {{TitleDescription Template | ||
|Title=Sex (of those who are not angels) | |Title=Sex (of those who are not angels) | ||
- | |Description=Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species into two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a Genre as a quality and then two qualia Male and Female as | + | |Description=Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species into two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a :Genre as a quality and then two qualia :Male and :Female. The :Genre dul:isQualityOf dul:NaturalPerson while :Male and :Female should be values available for :Genre. The problem with this approach is that DUL doesn't have Quale as property and there is not a relation between a dul:Quality and some other entity that could be a quale. In DOLCE a dol:quality and a dol:quale could be linked through the dol:hasQuale relation. |
}} | }} | ||
{{Graphical representation}} | {{Graphical representation}} |
Current revision
Sex (of those who are not angels)
Title: Sex (of those who are not angels)
Description: Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species into two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a :Genre as a quality and then two qualia :Male and :Female. The :Genre dul:isQualityOf dul:NaturalPerson while :Male and :Female should be values available for :Genre. The problem with this approach is that DUL doesn't have Quale as property and there is not a relation between a dul:Quality and some other entity that could be a quale. In DOLCE a dol:quality and a dol:quale could be linked through the dol:hasQuale relation.
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
About
Users | Luigi Selmi |
---|---|
Domains | |
Competency Questions | |
Scenarios | |
Proposed Solutions (OWL files) | |
Related patterns |
Additional information
References