Submissions:ChessGame
From Odp
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{My references}} | {{My references}} | ||
{{Submission to event | {{Submission to event | ||
| - | |Event= | + | |Event=[[WOP:2015]] |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:34, 31 August 2015
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 12342 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
| Name: | ChessGame |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | AdilaKrisnadhi |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | To model a flexible schema to allow exposing chess games as linked data. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: |
What did Kasparov say about his opponent first two moves in his commentary about his game against Topalov in 1999 Tournament in Wijk aan Zee? Who played against Kasparov in the round 1994 Linares tournament? Did (s)he play as a white or black player? What is the first move taken by black player in the Sicilian Defence opening? |
| Solution description: | This pattern represents a flexible schema for linked data querying of chess games. Players are modeled as AgentRole. In addition, notions such as chess moves, chess tournaments, as well as chess game annotation are included. |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | https://www.dropbox.com/s/7aek6yo8fj6ycnu/chesspattern.owl?dl=0 (0) |
| Consequences: | |
| Scenarios: | |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The ChessGame Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 12342) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
| Submission to event |
|---|
