Submissions:RelativeRelationship
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
AdilaKrisnadhi (Talk | contribs)
(New page: {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} {{Graphical representation header}} {{Graphical representation}} {{Content OP Proposal Template |SubmittedBy=AdilaKrisnadhi |Name=RelativeRelationship |Inte...)
Next diff →
Revision as of 03:13, 31 August 2015
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 12343 |
Graphical representation
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
General description
| Name: | RelativeRelationship |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | AdilaKrisnadhi |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | For dynamically conceptualizing, establishing, tracking, and updating relative relationships and dependencies between entities (real or representational) of a physical, temporal, and/or importance scope. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | Gypsum is cheaper to replace than brick. |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | https://www.dropbox.com/s/il4qqiw28d8ey1k/RR_Pattern.owl?dl=0 (0) |
| Consequences: | |
| Scenarios: | |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The RelativeRelationship Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
Scenarios
Scenarios about RelativeRelationship
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
Reviews about RelativeRelationship
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 12343) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
Modeling issues about RelativeRelationship
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
