Submissions:RelativeRelationship
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Domain=Parts and Collections, Decision-making, | |Domain=Parts and Collections, Decision-making, | ||
|ContentODPDescription=Gypsum is cheaper to replace than brick. | |ContentODPDescription=Gypsum is cheaper to replace than brick. | ||
| - | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=[https://curate.nd.edu/downloads/9p29086355b | + | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=[https://curate.nd.edu/downloads/9p29086355b] |
}} | }} | ||
{{Element list header}} | {{Element list header}} | ||
Revision as of 19:44, 11 October 2015
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 12364 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
| Name: | RelativeRelationship |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | AdilaKrisnadhi |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | For dynamically conceptualizing, establishing, tracking, and updating relative relationships and dependencies between entities (real or representational) of a physical, temporal, and/or importance scope. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | Gypsum is cheaper to replace than brick. |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | [1] (0) |
| Consequences: | |
| Scenarios: | |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The RelativeRelationship Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
See human-readable description at https://curate.nd.edu/concern/datasets/9k41zc79w4r
Scenarios
Scenarios about RelativeRelationship
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
Reviews about RelativeRelationship
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 12364) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
Modeling issues about RelativeRelationship
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
| Submission to event |
|---|
