Submissions:Co-participation
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This patterns does not allow to express the complete relation between an event and its participants: this has to be added manually. | This patterns does not allow to express the complete relation between an event and its participants: this has to be added manually. | ||
|Scenario=Mike and Greta had a great fun together. | |Scenario=Mike and Greta had a great fun together. | ||
| + | |ExtractedFrom=http://www.loa.cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl | ||
|HasComponent=Submissions:Participation | |HasComponent=Submissions:Participation | ||
|RelatedCP=Submissions:Participation | |RelatedCP=Submissions:Participation | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 30 May 2008
General description
| Name: | Co-participation |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | User:AldoGangemi |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | To represent two objects that both participate in a same event. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: |
|
| Solution description: | |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/coparticipation.owl (904) |
| Consequences: | Any two objects, agents, etc. participating in a same event, even partly or for some limited time, can be related. The pattern provides room for representing participation in that event as well, by importing the Submissions:Participation pattern.
This patterns does not allow to express the complete relation between an event and its participants: this has to be added manually. |
| Scenarios: | Mike and Greta had a great fun together. |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The Co-participation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
coparticipatesWith (owl:ObjectProperty) A symmetric binary relation between objects. It is intedned to represent coparticipation in same event, and such event and the related participation relations should be added separately.
coparticipatesWith pageReviews
Reviews about Co-participation
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 1904) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
