Submissions:Sequence
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 3671 |
General description
Name: | Sequence |
---|---|
Submitted by: | ValentinaPresutti |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | To represent sequence schemas. It defines the notion of transitive and intransitive precedence and their inverses.
It can then be used between tasks, processes, time intervals, spatially locate objects, situations, etc. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: | |
Solution description: | |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/sequence.owl (76) |
Consequences: | |
Scenarios: | |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Sequence Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
E.g. 'year 2000 follows 1999', 'preparing coffee' follows 'deciding what coffee to use', 'II World War follows I World War', etc.
It can be used between tasks, processes or time intervals, and subproperties would fit best in order to distinguish the different uses.
E.g. 'year 1999 precedes 2000', 'deciding what coffee to use' precedes 'preparing coffee', 'World War II follows World War I', 'in the Milan to Rome autoroute, Bologna precedes Florence', etc.
It can then be used between tasks, processes, time intervals, spatially locate objects, situations, etc.
Subproperties can be defined in order to distinguish the different uses.
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 3671) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab