Submissions:ConceptGroup
From Odp
![]() | If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 5598 |
General description
Name: | ConceptGroup |
---|---|
Submitted by: | Pierre-YvesVandenbussche |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | This CP allows designers to represent concept group defined by intention (all concepts satisfying group membership condition) or by extension (all concepts referring a group). |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: | |
Solution description: | How a group entity stands alone?, How to represent either a vocabulary subset, a cross vocabulary subset or a whole vocabulary?, How to represent group concept members? |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://sites.google.com/site/pierreyvesvandenbussche/resources/ConceptGroup.owl (1312) |
Consequences: | |
Scenarios: | Used to describe whole vocabulary entity or vocabulary concepts subset. Compliant with RefSets in SNOMED-CT or themes in GEMET. |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: |
|
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The ConceptGroup Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Scenarios
Scenarios about ConceptGroup
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
Reviews about ConceptGroup
Review article | Posted on | About revision (current is 5598) |
---|---|---|
MathieuDAquin about ConceptGroup | 24550838 September 2009 | 56605,660 |
FrancoisScharffe about ConceptGroup | 245508611 September 2009 | 57995,799 |
FrancoisScharffe about ConceptGroup | 245508611 September 2009 | 57995,799 |
AldoGangemi about ConceptGroup | 245508712 September 2009 | 58075,807 |
This revision (revision ID 5598) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
![]() | Submission to event |
---|