Submissions:SpeciesConservation
From Odp
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | ||
{{Include Image | {{Include Image | ||
- | |ImageName= | + | |ImageName=Speciesconservation.jpg |
}} | }} | ||
{{Content OP Proposal Template | {{Content OP Proposal Template | ||
+ | |SubmittedBy=User:EvaBlomqvist | ||
|Name=SpeciesConservation | |Name=SpeciesConservation | ||
- | | | + | |Intent=This pattern intend to represent a description of the conservation status of aquatic species. |
- | + | ||
|CompetencyQuestion=What is the conservation status of this species? What are the species with a specific conservation status? What species' conservation status contain a specific string? | |CompetencyQuestion=What is the conservation status of this species? What are the species with a specific conservation status? What species' conservation status contain a specific string? | ||
+ | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/speciesconservation.owl, | ||
|Consequences=The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. | |Consequences=The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. | ||
|Scenario=Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas | |Scenario=Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas | ||
- | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Element list header}} | {{Element list header}} | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|HasElement=hasConservationStatus | |HasElement=hasConservationStatus | ||
}} | }} | ||
- | + | (type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology | |
{{Scenarios about me}} | {{Scenarios about me}} | ||
{{Reviews about me}} | {{Reviews about me}} | ||
- | |||
- |
Revision as of 10:43, 23 February 2009
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 3551 |
General description
Name: | SpeciesConservation |
---|---|
Submitted by: | User:EvaBlomqvist |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | This pattern intend to represent a description of the conservation status of aquatic species. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/speciesconservation.owl (727) |
Consequences: | The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. |
Scenarios: | Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The SpeciesConservation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Mappable to fi:Species, fi:SpeciesRef, fi:SpeciesFeature, etc.
It has related axioms from FIGIS Schema that are included in the classes linked to the fi:Species class, such as fi:SpeciesRef (holding association with fi:AqResRef, which holds association with fi:WaterAreaRef).
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 3551) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab