From Odp

Jump to: navigation, search

This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 9125

Graphical representation



General description

Name: SpeciesConservation
Submitted by: EvaBlomqvist
Also Known As:
Intent: This pattern intend to represent a description of the conservation status of aquatic species.
Competency Questions:
  • What is the conservation status of this species? What are the species with a specific conservation status? What species' conservation status contain a specific string?
Solution description: --
Reusable OWL Building Block: (730)
Consequences: The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired.
Scenarios: Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:


The SpeciesConservation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

Class AquaticSpecies (owl:Class) Aquatic species are conceptual entities that are characterized together with resources and water areas.

Mappable to fi:Species, fi:SpeciesRef, fi:SpeciesFeature, etc.

It has related axioms from FIGIS Schema that are included in the classes linked to the fi:Species class, such as fi:SpeciesRef (holding association with fi:AqResRef, which holds association with fi:WaterAreaRef).

AquaticSpecies page
DatatypeProperty hasConservationStatus (owl:DatatypeProperty)
hasConservationStatus page

Additional information



Scenarios about SpeciesConservation

No scenario is added to this Content OP.


Reviews about SpeciesConservation

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9125) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Modeling issues

Modeling issues about SpeciesConservation

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


Add a reference

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers