Submissions:GeoInsight
From Odp
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 14481 |
Graphical representation
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
General description
| Name: | GeoInsight |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | AuriolDegbelo |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | The goal of the pattern is to model the when, what, who, how and scope of insight capture during an interaction session with a geovisualization. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: |
At which spatial scale is that statement valid? At which temporal scale is the statement valid? what do other users say about a geovisualization which features share similar traits on a given geovisualization? |
| Solution description: | A CONTENTSTATEMENT about the GEOVISUALIZATION with the SOURCE https://covid19.who.int/ is: "the countries most affected (million per population) in the Americas are the United States, Columbia, Peru, Brazil, Bolivia, and Chile". That CONTENTSTATEMENT highlights at DATAPATTERN of type CLUSTER |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | https://aurioldegbelo.github.io/geoi/ns/geoi-20200810.owl (0) |
| Consequences: | The pattern allows visualization developers to support insight capture during and after an interaction session with a geovisualization |
| Scenarios: | |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The GeoInsight Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 14481) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
| Submission to event |
|---|
