Submissions:SpeciesConservation
From Odp
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 9125 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
| Name: | SpeciesConservation |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | EvaBlomqvist |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | This pattern intend to represent a description of the conservation status of aquatic species. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: |
|
| Solution description: | -- |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/speciesconservation.owl (734) |
| Consequences: | The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. |
| Scenarios: | Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The SpeciesConservation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
AquaticSpecies (owl:Class) Aquatic species are conceptual entities that are characterized together with resources and water areas.
Mappable to fi:Species, fi:SpeciesRef, fi:SpeciesFeature, etc.
It has related axioms from FIGIS Schema that are included in the classes linked to the fi:Species class, such as fi:SpeciesRef (holding association with fi:AqResRef, which holds association with fi:WaterAreaRef).
AquaticSpecies page
Additional information
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9125) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
