Submissions:SimpleOrAggregated
From Odp
m |
m (Review has been assigned.) |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
|Event=WOP:2010 | |Event=WOP:2010 | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | [[Category:Review assigned]] |
Revision as of 09:32, 6 September 2010
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 10052 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
Name: | SimpleOrAggregated |
---|---|
Submitted by: | MariaPoveda, MariCarmenDeFigueroa |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | The goal of this pattern is to represent in a non-transitive fashion objects that can be simple or aggregated (that is, several objects gathered in another object acting as a whole). |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | The class "ObjectByCardinality" has been created to classify simple and aggregated objects into its subclasses "SimpleObject" and "AggregatedObject", respectively. These subclasses are disjoint among them.
The relationship of aggregation between objects is represented by means of the "hasAggregatedMember" property and its inverse "isAggregatedMemberOf". Finally, the class "AggregatedObject" has been defined as equivalent to those things that have at least two values for the property "hasAggregatedMember" with the aim of allowing the automatic classification of aggregated objects in this class when a reasoner is applied. |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/ontologies/SimpleOrAggregated.owl (1021) |
Consequences: | This Content OP allows designers to represent simple individuals of a given concept (that is, an individual that is made up of itself) and aggregated individuals of a given concept (that is, an individual that is made up of several individuals of the same concept).
In summary, this pattern allows to represent both simple objects and aggregated objects and their members. In addition, this pattern can be used to detect the following contradictory situation by means of applying a reasoner: 'to instanciate the relationship "hasAggregatedMember" for an Object that belongs to "SimpleObject"'. This situation represents a consistency error and it is detected when a resoner is applied due to the following modelling decisions included in the pattern: (a) "AggregatedObject" class represents the "hasAggregatedMember" domain and (b) it is disjoint with "SimpleObject". |
Scenarios: | A service provider can be simple or be an aggregate of a set of service providers.
A context source can be simple or be an aggregate of a set of context sources. A computing or storage resource can be simple or be an aggregate of a set of computing or storage resources. |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The SimpleOrAggregated Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Un objeto resultante de la agregación de dos o más objetos.
Cualquier objeto fÃsico, social o mental o sustancia.
Un objeto simple, es decir, un objeto que no tiene objetos agregados.
Additional information
Scenarios
- Modelling simple and aggregated service providers within the mIO! ontology network. Service providers are also organized by types. >>>
- Modelling simple and aggregated context sources within the mIO! ontology network. >>>
- Modelling simple and aggregated resources. These resources are also organized by types, specifically, they can be computing or storage resources. >>>
Reviews
Review article | Posted on | About revision (current is 10052) |
---|---|---|
CatherineRoussey about SimpleOrAggregated | 245545010 September 2010 | 1006410,064 |
GerdGroener about SimpleOrAggregated | 245545010 September 2010 | 1009710,097 |
VojtechSvatek about SimpleOrAggregated | 245545616 September 2010 | 1009710,097 |
This revision (revision ID 10052) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
Submission to event |
---|