Submissions:Tagging
From Odp
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Domain=General, Web2.0, DocumentManagement | |Domain=General, Web2.0, DocumentManagement | ||
|CompetencyQuestion=Who is tagging (the content of) what, by using what term from what folksonomy?, Which polarity has the tagging? | |CompetencyQuestion=Who is tagging (the content of) what, by using what term from what folksonomy?, Which polarity has the tagging? | ||
- | |ContentODPDescription=Tagging pattern exploits the[[ | + | |ContentODPDescription=Tagging pattern exploits the [[Submissions:Situation|Situation]] pattern in order to encode Gruber's definition that has tagging as a relation between an agent, a tag from a folksonomy, a content tagged, a polarity. |
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/tagging.owl | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/tagging.owl | ||
|Consequences=We are able to represent data about tagging activities from web 2.0 applications, from document annotation projects, or from RDFa documents. | |Consequences=We are able to represent data about tagging activities from web 2.0 applications, from document annotation projects, or from RDFa documents. |
Revision as of 02:03, 21 February 2010
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 7006 |
General description
Name: | Tagging |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | To represent a tagging situation, in which someone uses a term, from a list of a folksonomy, to tag something (or the content of something). We might also want to represent the time and the polarity of the tagging. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | Tagging pattern exploits the Situation pattern in order to encode Gruber's definition that has tagging as a relation between an agent, a tag from a folksonomy, a content tagged, a polarity. |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/tagging.owl (921) |
Consequences: | We are able to represent data about tagging activities from web 2.0 applications, from document annotation projects, or from RDFa documents. |
Scenarios: | A Flickr picture showing a leopard, tagged with the Tag 'leopard', A Flickr picture showing a boy surfing with a sombrero hat, tagged with the Tag 'cool', A Flickr picture tagged as 'taken in Sicily' |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Tagging Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
The tagging ontology drafted by Tom Gruber in FOL, and formalized here in OWL by Aldo Gangemi with pattern-based design. A Tag is here classified as a linguistic object that is used in the context of a Tagging Situation, which also involves a (tagged) Entity, an Agent, and a Folksonomy.
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 7006) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab