Submissions:Situation
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 9122 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
Name: | Situation |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
Also Known As: | situation |
Intent: | To represent contexts or situations, and the things that are contextualized. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | - |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/situation.owl (1336) |
Consequences: | We can contextualize things that have something in common, or are associated: a same place, time, view, causal link, systemic dependence, etc.
We can also reify n-ary relations as situations. |
Scenarios: | The lecture was held in January 1921 by Bela Fleck, with some physicians in the audience making questions, in a very relaxed athmosphere. |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Situation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
For example, a PlanExecution is a context including some actions executed by agents according to certain parameters and expected tasks to be achieved from a Plan; a DiagnosedSituation is a context of observed entities that is interpreted on the basis of a Diagnosis, etc.
Situation is also able to represent reified n-ary relations, where isSettingFor is the top-level relation for all binary projections of the n-ary relation. If used in a transformation pattern for n-ary relations, the designer should take care of:
- creating only one situation for each instance of an n-ary relation, otherwise the 'identification constraint' (Calvanese et al., IJCAI 2001) could be violated
- adding an 'exact cardinality' restriction corresponding to the arity of the n-ary relation, otherwise the designer would actually represent a polymorphic relation.
Additional information
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
(versionInfo): Created by Aldo Gangemi and Valentina Presutti
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
Scenarios
- I prepared a coffee with my heater, 300 ml of water, and an Arabica coffee mix. >>>
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9122) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
Modeling issue | Competency question | Domains |
---|---|---|
Situation classification | What situations satisfy a certain description? What descriptions can be (partly) satisfied by that situation? What situations (partly) satisfying a certain description can emerge out of this dataset? |
References