Submissions:Nary Participation
From Odp
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 9105 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
| Name: | Nary Participation |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | To represent events with their participants, time, space, etc. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: |
|
| Solution description: | --- |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/naryparticipation.owl (934) |
| Consequences: | All sorts of relations denoting events with multiple participants, space-time indexing, etc. can be represented with this pattern. When objects participate at the event at different times or with different parts, more elementary nary-participation instances must be created, and made parts of the main one. |
| Scenarios: | The match lasted 95 minutes, and the winner used a new nano-carbon racquet. |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The Nary Participation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
NaryParticipation (owl:Class) The reified class of n-ary participation relations, e.g. "prepare a coffee with coffee pot".
NaryParticipation page
participationIncludes (owl:ObjectProperty) The relation holding between an NaryParticipation and any Entity.
participationIncludes page isIncludedInParticipation (owl:ObjectProperty) The relation holding between any Entity and a NaryParticipation.
isIncludedInParticipation pageAdditional information
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9105) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
