Odp talk:Development

From Odp

---

Revision as of 16:06, 17 June 2008

This page is used to discuss new features between ODP administrators, testing templates or new extensions.

For tests or extension's example usage see Odp:Development/Tests

Contents 1 ToDo List 2 Done List 3 Improvements 3.1 FOAF 3.2 Open ID

ToDo List

• Adding red asterisk for required fields in sf's css (issue described in this feedback's page: Feedback:Required_fields)
• Scenarios
  • use (with page-inclusion, same as elements).
    • Are we sure?: I like the current solution, does not make the page too big (and difficult to read...) enrico
  • Moving all the content to a Scenario's page
  • [then] delete the properties Scenario and CPInstantiationExample for the fields 'Scenarios' and 'Examples (OWL files)

• Mail services
  • when a new account request is posted, send e-mail to bureaucrats
  • newsletter
  • Watch list with e-mail advertising: Improving the mediawiki feature 'Watch list' with email Mediawiki already does it.

• Reviews
  • 'ask for review'
• Create the Content OP Form (Template is the same as Content OP Proposal)
• browsing catalogue's owl through KANZAKI stylesheets (courtesy of http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/)
• replacing all application images .GIF and .JPG with equivalents .PNG or .SVG

• ODP Skin

Done List

• Distinguishing Open and QC Reviews (high priority)
  • each Proposed Content OP has the possibility to be reviewed from its page by clicking on 'post a review'. But if you are not a member of the QC you face an error page. (fixed -enrico)
  • I would like to fix this in the following way:
    • We allow all registered user to post a review but we distinguish QC reviews from open ones.
    • Is it possible to have only one link in the page (the one that is already there) and to redirect the user to either an 'Open Review' if (s)he is not a QC member, or to the official review if (s)he is a QC member?
  • Motivations are the following:
    • The regular discussion pages are not effectively perceived from users.
    • We want now have actually an open review mechanism as well as an official one.
    • It is bad that a user is faced with an error page when his/her intent is to post a comment on a wiki. At least (s)he should be redirected to the correct page where is allowed to post. However, t would be much better to make such process transparent to the user (as described above). -fixed

• [Reviews] Automatically insert the current version id when submitting a new Review not using a direct link from the proposal's page
• Addedd support for image file types: PNG, SVG
• Send article by e-mail extension (only for sysop)
• Scenarios
  • Created pages: Scenarios, Template:All scenarios
  • New category CPExample or Scenario for a new kind of page
  • Template and form for scenarios (Description (Description), Image (GraphicallyRepresentedBy), OWL file (OWLImplementation -URL-) ).
  • Create the property 'scenarioOf' to link the Scenario's page to the pattern(s)
  • Adding a link for adding scenarios, and including the list of the related scenarios (with page-inclusion, same as elements)

• Added property: GraphicallyRepresentedBy for pattern diagram
• News procedure added from page Odp:News
• www.ontologydesignpatterns.org is now redirected to ontologydesignpatterns.org
• Activated Review's procedure related to VersionID of the article
• Extension ReplaceText installed, go to see it, admin!

Improvements

FOAF

• loading a User info directly from a FOAF file
• Adding a user to a personal friend list

Open ID

• OpenID