| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Domain=Manufacturing, Chemistry, Workflow, Ecology | |Domain=Manufacturing, Chemistry, Workflow, Ecology | ||
|CompetencyQuestion=What material resources were required to produce a product?, Where did the transformation take place?, What was the time necessary for the transformation?, What other materials or conditions were necessary for the transformation process to occur?, What materials change during the transformation?, How much energy is required for the transformation to take place? | |CompetencyQuestion=What material resources were required to produce a product?, Where did the transformation take place?, What was the time necessary for the transformation?, What other materials or conditions were necessary for the transformation process to occur?, What materials change during the transformation?, How much energy is required for the transformation to take place? | ||
| − | |ContentODPDescription=The pattern models a material transformation as something that has inputs and catalysts, and produces some outputs. All inputs, catalysts and outputs are material, and within them, embodied energy may be described. | + | |ContentODPDescription=The pattern models a material transformation as something that has inputs and catalysts, and produces some outputs. All inputs, catalysts and outputs are material, and within them, embodied energy may be described. |
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://descartes-core.org/ontologies/mt/1.0/MaterialTransformationPattern.owl | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://descartes-core.org/ontologies/mt/1.0/MaterialTransformationPattern.owl | ||
| − | |Consequences=This is not a very generic pattern describing a change of states. It may not be applicable to broader types of transformation, like change of money, or change of political affiliations, etc. However, an instance of this pattern may be chained with another instance of this pattern or an instance of semantic trajectory. | + | |Consequences=This is not a very generic pattern describing a change of states. It may not be applicable to broader types of transformation, like change of money, or change of political affiliations, etc. However, an instance of this pattern may be chained with another instance of this pattern or an instance of semantic trajectory. |
|Scenario=A pile of wood is transformed into ash by burning. Emboddied energy involved in the process of mixing aggregate, water, cement and other binders to create concrete. Materials required to construct a manufactured artifact such as a window (glass, wood, aluminum). | |Scenario=A pile of wood is transformed into ash by burning. Emboddied energy involved in the process of mixing aggregate, water, cement and other binders to create concrete. Materials required to construct a manufactured artifact such as a window (glass, wood, aluminum). | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
{{Modeling issues about me}} | {{Modeling issues about me}} | ||
{{My references}} | {{My references}} | ||
| + | {{Submission to event | ||
| + | |Event=WOP 2014 | ||
| + | }} | ||
|
Last modified date is: 2014-07-17 |
Diagram
The Material Transformation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
There are two axioms that we need in this pattern but not expressible in OWL. The first says that there is at least one of the input that is not in the output of the transformation, which cannot be expressed in FOL as the formula: ALL x.( MaterialTransformation(x) IMPLIES Exists y.(hasInput(x,y) AND NOT hasOutput(x,y) ) ) The second states that there is at least one of the output that is not part of the input of the transformation: ALL x.( MaterialTransformation(x) IMPLIES Exists y.(hasOutput(x,y) AND NOT hasInput(x,y) ) ) Thus, this OWL encoding does not contain any axiom expressing the above two.
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 11938) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
|
Submission to event |
|---|
'Ontology Design Patterns'
