Submissions:Material Transformation Revision as of 05:21, 17 July 2014 by AdilaKrisnadhi (Talk | contribs) (diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Warning!

This is an old revision. Go to current revision

This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

Last modified date is: 2014-07-17

Graphical representation

Diagram

General description

Name:	Material Transformation
Submitted by:	AdilaKrisnadhi
Also Known As:
Intent:	To contextualize the transformation process from raw components and the required equipment to a final manufactured artifact.
Domains:	Manufacturing, Chemistry, Workflow, Ecology
Competency Questions:	What material resources were required to produce a product? Where did the transformation take place? What was the time necessary for the transformation? What other materials or conditions were necessary for the transformation process to occur? What materials change during the transformation? How much energy is required for the transformation to take place?
Solution description:	The pattern models a material transformation as something that has inputs and catalysts, and produces some outputs. All inputs, catalysts and outputs are material, and within them, embodied energy may be described.
Reusable OWL Building Block:	1 (159)
Consequences:	This is not a very generic pattern describing a change of states. It may not be applicable to broader types of transformation, like change of money, or change of political affiliations, etc. However, an instance of this pattern may be chained with another instance of this pattern or an instance of semantic trajectory.
Scenarios:	A pile of wood is transformed into ash by burning. Emboddied energy involved in the process of mixing aggregate, water, cement and other binders to create concrete. Materials required to construct a manufactured artifact such as a window (glass, wood, aluminum).
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:

Elements

The Material Transformation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

hasCatalyst (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasCatalyst page

hasEmbodiedEnergy (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasEmbodiedEnergy page

hasEnergyUnit (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasEnergyUnit page

hasEnergyValue (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasEnergyValue page

hasInput (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasInput page

hasOutput (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasOutput page

needsEnergy (owl:ObjectProperty)

needsEnergy page

occursAtTimeInterval (owl:ObjectProperty)

occursAtTimeInterval page

occursInNeighborhood (owl:ObjectProperty)

occursInNeighborhood page

asLiteral (owl:DatatypeProperty)

asLiteral page

asNumeric (owl:DatatypeProperty)

asNumeric page

Catalyst (owl:Class)

Catalyst page

Energy (owl:Class)

Energy page

EnergyUnit (owl:Class)

EnergyUnit page

EnergyValue (owl:Class)

EnergyValue page

MaterialTransformation (owl:Class)

MaterialTransformation page

MaterialType (owl:Class)

MaterialType page

Neighborhood (owl:Class)

Neighborhood page

Product (owl:Class)

Product page

Resource (owl:Class)

Resource page

Additional information

There are two axioms that we need in this pattern but not expressible in OWL. The first says that there is at least one of the input that is not in the output of the transformation, which cannot be expressed in FOL as the formula: ALL x.( MaterialTransformation(x) IMPLIES Exists y.(hasInput(x,y) AND NOT hasOutput(x,y) ) ) The second states that there is at least one of the output that is not part of the input of the transformation: ALL x.( MaterialTransformation(x) IMPLIES Exists y.(hasOutput(x,y) AND NOT hasInput(x,y) ) ) Thus, this OWL encoding does not contain any axiom expressing the above two.

Scenarios

Scenarios about Material Transformation

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about Material Transformation

There is no review about this proposal.

Some subquery has no valid condition.

This revision (revision ID 11937) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Modeling issues

Modeling issues about Material Transformation

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.

Some subquery has no valid condition.

References

Add a reference