| CreationDate
|
19 September 2010 +
|
| HasClearProblemDescription
|
I think the scenario could be made clearer and more meaningful by showing how to link tags to the owl entities denoting the same object as the tag
|
| HasMissingInformation
|
How do I link the tag :parisTag2 in your scenario to http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hilton%2C_Paris?
|
| HasProblems
|
The OWL source does not load properly in either topbraid or neon. This should be fixed.
|
| HasRelevance
|
This is very useful pattern applicable to zillions of scenarios
|
| HasReusability
|
The pattern is very reusable
|
| HasReviewScore
|
1 -needsminorrevision +
|
| HasReviewSummary
|
Useful pattern supporting the reification … Useful pattern supporting the reification of literal values within OWL, so that they can be used as 'first class objects' in OWL models. The pattern seems valid, however I had trouble trying to browse it in both NeOn and Topbraid, which made my life a bit painful. I am also surprised that the pattern does not clarify how to link the resulting reified literals to the obvious related entities - e,g, an entity such as http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hilton%2C_Paris, which describes ParisHilton. ton%2C_Paris, which describes ParisHilton.
|
| HasReviewerConfidence
|
High
|
| HasUnderstandability
|
The pattern is reasonably easy to understand although the description, context and motivation are rather minimalist
|
| IsBestPractice
|
There are a lot of proposals about how to talk about tags and link web2.0 systems to the semantic web and a comparison with the way other people have tackled this problem would be useful.
|
| LastModifiedDate
|
19 September 2010 +
|
| Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
19 September 2010 19:24:12 +
|
| ReviewAboutSubmissionThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
Literal Reification +
|
| ReviewAboutVersion
|
10,110 +
|
| SubmittedBy
|
EnricoMotta +
|
| Categories |
QCReview +
|
