CreationDate

10 September 2010 +

HasClearFigures

Could be improved (see above):
Give the example in the same representation style like on the web page of W3C.

HasProblems

As already said, the main problem is that this is not really a nary relation.

HasRelevance

high

HasReusability

borderline

HasReviewScore

1 needsminorrevision +

HasReviewSummary

The pattern extends (or restricts) the na … The pattern extends (or restricts) the nary relationship pattern (Pattern1) from W3C. In the W3C pattern, the elements of the nary relation are nondistinguished. In this case, the inverse property means defining the inverse property of all properties.
The proposed pattern makes a simple, but from my point of view a quite restricting assumption. In the nary relation, there are two distinguishable elements and the ontology engineer is only interested of the inverse property of the property that connects this two elements.
The other elements are considered as optional.
Concerning this restriction, I doubt that this is really a nary relation! The focus is only on the relations between this two distinguishable elements. The others can be neglected. ble elements. The others can be neglected.

HasReviewerConfidence

high

HasUnderstandability

Could be improved:
Firstly, I would use the same type of diagram as on the W3C page. Secondly, I suggest to give an example with a diagram for your pattern. Moreover, I would use one of the examples that are given on the W3C page.

IsBestPractice

good

LastModifiedDate

10 September 2010 +

Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.

10 September 2010 16:43:59 +

ReviewAboutSubmissionThis property is a special property in this wiki.

Summarization of an inverse nary relation +

ReviewAboutVersion

10,060 +

SubmittedBy

GerdGroener +

Categories 
QCReview +
