| CreationDate
|
1 September 2009 +
|
| HasClearRelevanceDescription
|
Something more could be said in the motivation about the consequences that using the wrong solution (anti-pattern) could have in terms of consistency of the ontology and satisfiability of its classes
|
| HasProblems
|
I would add some natural language description of the problem example to the bare OWL code.
|
| HasReviewScore
|
1 -needsminorrevision +
|
| HasReviewSummary
|
In order to avoid the confusion I would ra … In order to avoid the confusion I would rather describe the solution as the pattern, rather than the anti-pattern. Therefore, i would leave the motivation untouched but I'd reword the aim. Instead of describing the common mistake and its possible correction, I would start describing the situation, i.e.: a universal value restriction on a property that has, in fact, as its range the union of two disjunct classes. s range the union of two disjunct classes.
|
| HasReviewerConfidence
|
Good
|
| HasUnderstandability
|
Rewording the Aim section will avoid confusion between the anti-pattern and the proposed solution.
Commenting the problem example with more text in addition to the OWL could certainly improve the understandability of the pattern.
|
| LastModifiedDate
|
1 September 2009 +
|
| Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
1 September 2009 08:51:04 +
|
| ReviewAboutSubmissionThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL) +
|
| ReviewAboutVersion
|
5,621 +
|
| SubmittedBy
|
LuigiIannone +
|
| Categories |
QCReview +
|
