Browse wiki

From Odp

Jump to: navigation, search
Reviews:MathieuDAquin about ConceptGroup
CreationDate 8 September 2009  +
HasClearFigures OK.
HasClearProblemDescription Not really. I don't in which scenario this helps.
HasClearRelevanceDescription Not really.
HasMissingInformation example of usage, clear description/definition of the entities.
HasProblems The general issues I see here concern clar The general issues I see here concern clarity and possible usage. The first thing is that I am not sure what is meant by concept here. Does it corresponds to the concept of an ontology? In this case shouldn't it be related to owl:Class in the OWL description? This would cause a number of issues at the logical level, in particular, if Group is a concept. This needs to be made clear in my opinion. Also, Group should be called ConceptGroup. I don't really understand the difference between subgroup and narrowerThan. Isn't a subgroup narrower? Finally, I don't see a clear application for this pattern as is. clear application for this pattern as is.
HasRelations PartOf pattern applied to concepts?
HasRelevance Not clear to me.
HasReusability Unclear.
HasReviewScore 0 -needsmajorrevision  +
HasReviewSummary This pattern, as far as I understand, to represents groups of concepts. I think the pattern would be interesting to discuss, but suffer from a number of problems as detailed below.
HasReviewerConfidence I am not really clear about this particular pattern.
HasUnderstandability Low
IsBestPractice The current form of the pattern doesn't seem to relate with best practices, and at least in naming, is not really appropriate.
LastModifiedDate 8 September 2009  +
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 8 September 2009 12:34:02  +
ReviewAboutSubmissionThis property is a special property in this wiki. ConceptGroup +
ReviewAboutVersion 5,660  +
SubmittedBy MathieuDAquin +
Categories QCReview +
hide properties that link here 
  No properties link to this page.


Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.
Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers