| CreationDate
|
8 September 2009 +
|
| HasClearFigures
|
OK.
|
| HasClearProblemDescription
|
Not really. I don't in which scenario this helps.
|
| HasClearRelevanceDescription
|
Not really.
|
| HasMissingInformation
|
example of usage, clear description/definition of the entities.
|
| HasProblems
|
The general issues I see here concern clar … The general issues I see here concern clarity and possible usage.
The first thing is that I am not sure what is meant by concept here. Does it corresponds to the concept of an ontology? In this case shouldn't it be related to owl:Class in the OWL description? This would cause a number of issues at the logical level, in particular, if Group is a concept. This needs to be made clear in my opinion.
Also, Group should be called ConceptGroup.
I don't really understand the difference between subgroup and narrowerThan. Isn't a subgroup narrower?
Finally, I don't see a clear application for this pattern as is. clear application for this pattern as is.
|
| HasRelations
|
PartOf pattern applied to concepts?
|
| HasRelevance
|
Not clear to me.
|
| HasReusability
|
Unclear.
|
| HasReviewScore
|
0 -needsmajorrevision +
|
| HasReviewSummary
|
This pattern, as far as I understand, to represents groups of concepts.
I think the pattern would be interesting to discuss, but suffer from a number of problems as detailed below.
|
| HasReviewerConfidence
|
I am not really clear about this particular pattern.
|
| HasUnderstandability
|
Low
|
| IsBestPractice
|
The current form of the pattern doesn't seem to relate with best practices, and at least in naming, is not really appropriate.
|
| LastModifiedDate
|
8 September 2009 +
|
| Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
8 September 2009 12:34:02 +
|
| ReviewAboutSubmissionThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
ConceptGroup +
|
| ReviewAboutVersion
|
5,660 +
|
| SubmittedBy
|
MathieuDAquin +
|
| Categories |
QCReview +
|
