Browse wiki

CreationDate	16 September 2010 +
HasMissingInformation	Example in OWL
HasProblems	There are two problems: first, it's the name as mentioned above, second I would recommend to use the same notation as in the W3C n-ary relationship which is cited. This would make the difference and the understanding clearer.
HasRelations	Unfortunately the n-ary relationship is not available on ontologydesignpatterns.org
HasRelevance	good
HasReviewScore	1 -needsminorrevision +
HasReviewSummary	This pattern is an extension of the W3C n- … This pattern is an extension of the W3C n-ary relationship in that a n-ary realtionship can be summarized in a simple relationship between two individuals. I can image that querying a knowledge base is easier - however, I encourage the author to clarify and explain how this aim is achieved (give an example, etc.). However, there is one problem with the pattern and that's the name: the pattern does not describe an inverse n-ary relationship but a special kind of it where only two distinguished individuals are considered with "additional, and probably optional, argument". itional, and probably optional, argument".
HasReviewerConfidence	high
IsBestPractice	good
LastModifiedDate	16 September 2010 +
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.	16 September 2010 13:22:12 +
ReviewAboutSubmissionThis property is a special property in this wiki.	Summarization of an inverse n-ary relation +
ReviewAboutVersion	10,101 +
SubmittedBy	OlafNoppens +
Categories	QCReview +

	No properties link to this page.