| CreationDate
|
10 September 2009 +
|
| HasClearFigures
|
None provided
|
| HasClearProblemDescription
|
Yes
|
| HasClearRelevanceDescription
|
They are not clearly stated, but intuitively understandable
|
| HasMissingInformation
|
Overall documentation
|
| HasProblems
|
Some comment:
* The pattern seems very us … Some comment:
* The pattern seems very useful, expecially if used (possible use case) in knowledge systems where is difficult to migrate knowledge bases from OWL1 to OWL2, for different reasons.
* the functional syntax seems wrong: According to the W3C specs, it should be NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion(ns:prop ns:i1 ns:i2)
* it seems to me more a reengineering pattern, as it relates two similar but different languages.
* I am not completely sure that there is an equivalence relation among the LHS and the LHS, so I expect a proof or explanation accompaning it
* The modeling problem is well stated, but besides the proposed solution, no documentation is provided (ise cases, scenario, etc.) on is provided (ise cases, scenario, etc.)
|
| HasRelations
|
Not in my knowledge
|
| HasRelevance
|
medium
|
| HasReusability
|
Possibly, but some use case should be provided.
|
| HasReviewScore
|
0 -needsmajorrevision +
|
| HasReviewSummary
|
The purpose of this pattern is to allowe negative object property assertion in OWL 1, which are not allowed directly.
|
| HasReviewerConfidence
|
Not fully aware of all details of OWL2 constructors and semantics, but knowledgeable in Description logics and OWL1
|
| HasUnderstandability
|
See comments above: problem clear stated, but solution less documented
|
| IsBestPractice
|
It can be seen as a good pattern to express (as stated by the author) a logical construct not present in one language
|
| LastModifiedDate
|
10 September 2009 +
|
| Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
10 September 2009 14:07:54 +
|
| ReviewAboutSubmissionThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
NegativePropertyAssertions +
|
| ReviewAboutVersion
|
5,778 +
|
| SubmittedBy
|
StefanoDavid +
|
| Categories |
QCReview +
|
