Submissions:AquaticResources
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 9065 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
Name: | AquaticResources |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | To represent aquatic resources or stocks as composed of aquatic organisms from one or more species, and living in a water area. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | -- |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/aquaticresources.owl (832) |
Consequences: | Relations between aquatic resources and either aquatic species or water areas can be represented. In order to infer what species typically live in what water areas however, an application needs to add a SWRL rule, or a SPARQL query that unifies the hasSpecies and hasWaterArea relations. |
Scenarios: | give me the Species for water area 24; give me the Water areas for species Gadus morhua. |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The AquaticResources Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Mappable to fi:Species, fi:SpeciesRef, fi:SpeciesFeature, etc.
It has related axioms from FIGIS Schema that are included in the classes linked to the fi:Species class, such as fi:SpeciesRef (holding association with fi:AqResRef, which holds association with fi:WaterAreaRef).
It can be mapped to fi:AqResRef
Additional information
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
(versionInfo): 1.0
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9065) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References