Submissions:Bias Event Pattern
From Odp
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 14396 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
| Name: | Bias Event Pattern |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | MayraRusso |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | An Ontology Design Pattern to Document Bias Events in Machine Learning Pipelines |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: |
Who was involved as bias recipient in a bias event? Who was involved as bias source in a bias event? What type of bias is documented? What bias detection method was used? What is the implication of the bias event documented? Who are the bias recipient agents that do not have a bias source agent? What are the bias events for which the bias recipient role is unknown? What are the bias events for which the bias source role is unknown? |
| Solution description: | We contribute towards improving the interpretation of the biases affecting ML systems while also accounting for them. We see this ODP as a building block to produce reliable and bias-aware documentation of machine learning pipelines |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | https://labs.tib.eu/sdm/data/BiasEvent.owl (0) |
| Consequences: | |
| Scenarios: | While the Bias Event ODP presented in this work is intended to be used with any machine learning pipeline, our use case is motivated by the surge of fake news classification systems. |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The Bias Event Pattern Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 14396) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
