Submissions:Born Digital Archives
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 13162 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
Name: | Born Digital Archives |
---|---|
Submitted by: | MarinaRiga, PanagiotisMitzias, EfstratiosKontopoulos |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | The pattern intends to model the domain of born digital archives. This pattern has been developed by MKLab at CERTH/ITI for the PERICLES FP7 project. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | The pattern's main entity is a unit, subclassed by fonds, series, files and items. |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://mklab.iti.gr/pericles/BornDigitalArchives_ODP.owl (937) |
Consequences: | The design pattern is expected to facilitate the creation of domain ontologies related to Born Digital Archives that can be exploited in numerous fields. A well-established, comprehensible pattern will prove to be advantageous. |
Scenarios: |
|
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Born Digital Archives Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Sub-fonds: A subdivision of a fonds containing a body of related records corresponding to administrative subdivisions in the originating agency or organization or, when that is not possible, to geographical, chronological, functional, or similar groupings of the material itself. When the creating body has a complex hierarchical structure, each sub-fonds has as many subordinate sub-fonds as are necessary to reflect the levels of the hierarchical structure of the primary subordinate administrative unit.
Additional information
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 13162) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References