Submissions:ClimaticZone
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 8837 |
Graphical representation
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
General description
Name: | ClimaticZone |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AldoGangemi, EvaBlomqvist |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | The intent of the pattern is to be able to represent climatic zones for aquatic resources. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | -- |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/climaticzone.owl (856) |
Consequences: | This pattern only allows to query what climatic zones are typical of an aquatic resource. Whereas such values can be subject to observation, another pattern based on the generic 'observation' pattern should be used.
The climatic zone is intended to have a fixed set of values (to be defined as nominals) but this is not explicit in the pattern. |
Scenarios: | Give me the resource observations where the zone is 'Tropical' |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The ClimaticZone Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
It can be mapped to fi:AqResRef
Additional information
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/observation.owl
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/aquaticresources.owl
(versionInfo): Created by Eva Blomqvist
(hasUnitTest): SELECT ?x WHERE {?x a :AquaticResourceObservation. ?x :hasClimaticZone :Tropical}
(versionInfo): 1.0
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 8837) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References