Submissions:Collection
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 9074 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
Name: | Collection |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
Also Known As: | membership, collection entity |
Intent: | To represent domain (not set theory) membership. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | A class collection represents the concept of a set of entities (things). Things are members of the collection. |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/collectionentity.owl (1911) |
Consequences: | Collections and their members can be associated. Time-indexed membership cannot be represented though (you need a situation-based pattern). |
Scenarios: | My saxophone collection includes a Mark VI tenor, a Balanced Action alto, and a Conn Transitional bari. |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Collection Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
The collection entity pattern. It is extracted from DOLCE-UltraLite by partial clone of elements.
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
(versionInfo): Created by Aldo Gangemi and Valentina Presutti
(comment): The collection entity pattern. It is extracted from DOLCE-UltraLite by partial clone of elements.
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9074) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References