Submissions:SmartHome TimeInterval
From Odp
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 13366 |
Graphical representation
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
General description
| Name: | time |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | MarjanAlirezaie |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | This pattern allows us to represent a temporal distance between two timestamps within an observation process in a SmartHome. There are other situations where we need to measure the interval (temporal distance) in the form of time steps regardless of the exact dates indicating the boundaries of the interval. The latter case is used when we want to define a complex event based on the temporal distance with its preconditions. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: |
|
| Solution description: | Specializing the OWL-Time ontology |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://ecareathome-ontology.mpi.aass.oru.se/patterns/time.owl (670) |
| Consequences: | We can quantitavely represent temporal distances through an observation process for different purposes . These purposes include
definition of an event in terms of its preconditions whose occurance timestamp is within a specific temporal distance with that of the event. |
| Scenarios: | |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The SmartHome TimeInterval Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 13366) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
