Submissions:Time indexed participation
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 9130 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
Name: | Time indexed participation |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | To represent participants in events at some time,To represent participants in parts of events. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | This pattern uses the Situation pattern to add temporal information to participation of objects into events. |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/timeindexedparticipation.owl (887) |
Consequences: | We can represent participation relations with time. This enables participations at different times as well as partial participations in events.
However, this pattern focuses on participation of one entity in one event. If complex events need to be represented (with subevents, more participants and times, etc.), a partonomic structure must be introduced, e.g. by creating a new pattern that composes TimeIndexedParticipation with PartOf. |
Scenarios: | This morning I've prepared my coffee and had my fingers burnt, The football match lasted only ten minutes for Totti |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Time indexed participation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
A time-indexed pattern for participation
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9130) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References